Jesus is giving us a win-win scenario, but what we always do with the gospel is make it into a win-lose. That's the only way the dualistic mind can think. You're either in or you're out.
That's why the world does not love us, because we don't know how to include, how to forgive, how to pour mercy and compassion and patience upon events as God - thank God - does with us.
God's grace plays the middle, expands the middle, redeems the middle, and if that's not true, what hope is there? What hope is there if we don't learn how to hold the contradictions?
Richard Rohr, from Holding the Tension: The Power of Paradox
Do you know, I think it's this that has come out of all that I've been reading about The Lambeth Conference? (Reading recent posts in Anglican Centrist and LambethJournal will give you much more about why I say this that I could in a few sentences.)
I honestly do believe that the Anglican Communion has an immense amount to offer the entire Christian Church at the moment; and it is precisely because of our present hermeneutical troubles that we are broken enough to do it. Our willingness to open ourselves to what the Spirit is doing, to the real nature of the Gospel as lived in our own time - rather than as lived in some "historical Jesus" New Testament reconstruction of the mind, or at some possibly romanticised period in Church history - is showing us more about the grace and mercy of Christ than we could possibly have expected.
I cannot resist quoting at length from Bishop George E Packer, Episcopal Suffragan Bishop of Chaplaincies and Bishop-in-Charge of Micronesia:
If the Anglican Communion would just turn over their troubles to my 40 member indaba group everything would be fine. We had a break through as an American female bishop likened our church to siblings arguing in the back seat of the family car. There was a murmur of final understanding since there had been a wonder if those Episcopalians were coming unglued. No, just poking each other the way kids do. "But we stay together and that's what makes unwanted boundary crossings by South American and African bishops so confusing." She said.
I was re-playing that fateful day in Minneapolis in 2003 in my mind when we confirmed Gene Robinson's consecration and how no one gave much of a passing thought to how this news would impact anyone in this room. Some have been beaten and called members of "the gay church" in cultures where sympathizers like that were stoned, others have died... not because of Gene but because dioceses have rejected the HIV-AIDS assistance from the American church's tainted money.
The conversation - for the Americans and the Canadians - had real remorse in it: we acted without care for the greater family and we were deeply sorry. I'm not saying the consecration wouldn't have happened but the hurt of disregard for them - which was plain and evident - would not have been there.
Then Bishop Michael of Sudan continued as he said that his church was only getting used to thinking about homosexuals now with that he composed a prayer right on the spot emphasizing his point. After the entreaty to "Our dear Lord" it was as sensitive a summary of their uncertain lives in his land that I had ever heard. We were silent. (I wonder if this Lambeth is about where had hoped the 1998 meeting would have been in the appreciation of basic gay lives and rights.)
The bishop went on to say that we had to give he and his people some time; elevating gay persons into leadership positions of authority was confusing to him and his congregations. "Can't a baptized person get into heaven without you making him a bishop for awhile?" He had us there. As he was speaking I wasn't sure if the nods were in sympathy or agreement. It seemed like both and it came about as there was an acceptance of North American remorse.
The atmosphere in the room had changed. Said our facilitator, "We seem to have arrived at a special level of trust." And that seemed to hold true for the heretofore stilted conversations about the Covenant too, that code of conduct we have all been dreading. Now, there was a growing consensus around the things which make us an affirmed, communion of churches in search of a grace-filled process which would come to the rescue when we get out of sorts with each other. It had been the meanderings in recent years for the right venue to discuss this which has been so maddening.
If we could only come up with a process of soft intention, setting our minds and hearts in the way Christ would want us to behave when things get enflamed... sort of a compact indaba. +gep
No comments:
Post a Comment